Tax would be based on value of property which is public knowledge.
-
-
Sure, but that doesn't stop a landlord from charging more than their tax burden. Trying to take tools out of their toy box.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The matter-of-fact manner in which folks here are throwing around things they'd dictate to others, as if they're cattle to prod, is striking
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
So you're opposed to all taxes? Do you actually care which taxes are "constitutional" or is it something you just say to shut ppl up?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, not all: I support community service payments via property contracts, usage fees for shared infra, and other nonviolent forms of funding
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
So you _are_ opposed to all taxes, just as Yehuda said.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And in particular, the constitutional arguments are just smokescreens.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
The constitutional argument is bunk anyway. Ofc an income tax was unconstitutional by original document, just like banning slaves was.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Banning slaves was legal under the Constitution (the north did it), but Fugitive Slave Act was constitutional


3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
For sure - states could choose to, but the federal government couldn't force ALL to - until the 13th amendment at least.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Now you're making me wonder. What if POTUS and the Senate approved a treaty that included a slave-banning provision?
-
-
You should have been a con-law professor :)
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.