The right question, and I'll answer. Have to say first: what you wrote just now matters to me
-
-
I've been there, the North Bridge. Walked the Battle Road. I know why we have a Second Amendment.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Contradiction I thought I saw: tut-tutting over a known-partisan dork's overstatement; radio silence on potus
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jorendorff @St_Rev
1/ I'm not yer fair-and-balanced pundit, TL full of POTUS slams. 2/ RT is not tut-tutting. 3/ "Known dork" has more elite clout than Trump.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
POTUS slams sure, but not much on calling for POTUS to apply "radical Islamic terrorism" logic to white supremacists.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm against anti-Islam "terrust" labeling, I object to that and I've tweeted so, when worth tweeting. I'm not here to echo your chamber!
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
Can't decide what's more aggravating, the arrogance of these scolds ordering you what to say, or their laziness in reading what you did say.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
I'll take the Brendan slam (and offer a mea culpa) but we didn't need a content-less pile on.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That said, I generally think it's fair that left leaning folks find the president's behavior frustrating.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But I'm not going to tar everyone on the right with one brush. I don't like when the right goes around demanding Muslims denounce things.
-
-
Glad you don't tar everyone on one side of a point on a line! I try to avoid that too.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @St_Rev
I also don't think it's surprising that "president's response was so milquetoast that the stormer liked it" is driving a lot of discourse.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.