Consistency would be calling out evil by its name. "Radical Jihadi Terrorism" "White Supremacist (or Nazi) Terrorism"
-
-
Replying to @wycats
would be consistent with his messaging as candidate (maybe even more in character). Inconsistent with how he dealt with Scalise attack
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ruisalgado
Do you mean consistent with his attitudes towards white supremacists (positive) during the campaign? If so I agree.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
I thought that Trump is Hitler illusion had died off by now. Guess not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ruisalgado
I didn't say that. Are you saying Trump isn't surprisingly cozy with white supremacists?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
Not really. But I agree he lost an opportunity today. He is not effective with these PC, innocuous comments.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ruisalgado
All I know is if the daily stormer was cheering my comments I'd be asking myself what I was doing wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @ruisalgado
And I agree that he's being, ironically, politically correct.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
I was just pointing out the confirmation bias wrt Trump and WS. When it's just been his response to these kind of events lately
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ruisalgado
There's a big difference in the time to respond as well as the size of the response but I agree he was low key on scalise.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That said, scalise response was the GOP playbook for a shooting.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.