React is subject to the same boom and bust cycles we've seen in frameworks past. Nothing bad about that, but be prepared.
-
-
Replying to @mikeal
Disagree. React is a set of ideas, not a framework. Hard to think of modern UI tools not being "React" in some way or another.
8 replies 25 retweets 145 likes -
That's a good way to make react's success a tautology, but doesn't really respond to what
@mikeal was saying.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Dan Abramov's said similar: React's ideas are widely accepted by now. Whatever comes after React will almost certainly follow similar model
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
In that case it's not helpful to call those ideas "react" any more than it's helpful to call garbage collection "lisp"
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
LISP created GC? Interesting—didn't know :) But ya, people are already taking React's model for granted, even w/o react, so u have a point
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Unsure how accurate, but http://www.paulgraham.com/diff.html
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @AdamRackis and
(This is one of the things i was also taught was a point of contention in the LISP/C war)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
The whole Worse is Better essay is great. It's about how to make lisp succeed broadly. (spoiler alert: they didn't listen to him)
-
-
Replying to @wycats @knowtheory and
Here's the whole essay. https://www.dreamsongs.com/WIB.html I find it fascinating.
0 replies 1 retweet 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.