React is subject to the same boom and bust cycles we've seen in frameworks past. Nothing bad about that, but be prepared.
-
-
Replying to @mikeal
Disagree. React is a set of ideas, not a framework. Hard to think of modern UI tools not being "React" in some way or another.
8 replies 25 retweets 145 likes -
That's a good way to make react's success a tautology, but doesn't really respond to what
@mikeal was saying.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Dan Abramov's said similar: React's ideas are widely accepted by now. Whatever comes after React will almost certainly follow similar model
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
In that case it's not helpful to call those ideas "react" any more than it's helpful to call garbage collection "lisp"
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
... people routinely pop into conversations about new language features and say "lisp did this all the way back in 1492" :)
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Yeah people do. They forget that context matters and decisions made because "64k is enough for everyone" might be wrong today.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Also I took some liberties with 640k.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
6.4k? 640 bytes?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.