2: the steady state is that higher qualified underrepresented groups are getting systematically rejected in favor of lower qualified.
-
-
-
3: AA programs attempt to fix that systematic issue, but if you think the starting state is "all groups are selected based on merit"
-
4: you will think the underrepresented groups are being given an unfair leg up. But again, the core problem is that without intervention
-
5: higher qualified women are passed over ALL THE TIME. This is why "meritocracy" is controversial. Assuming it as the true starting state
-
6/6: causes people to get things exactly backwards. Higher qualified women, POC, etc being passed over, not the reverse.
-
Can we make it visible so other people can see it more easily?
-
Are they trying?
-
People might not be aware of studies like http://gender.stanford.edu/news/2014/why-does-john-get-stem-job-rather-jennifer … (or not believe them)
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.