Repeat after me: DRM is not about piracy. Casual sharing is not piracy: http://www.idealog.com/blog/drm-may-not-prevent-piracy-but-it-might-still-protect-sales/ … Hixie empiricism:http://www.zdnet.com/article/google-engineer-drm-has-nothing-to-do-with-piracy/ …
-
-
Why do large scale rackets endure (and capture pols/regulators)? Money talks, esp. with too little competition. Incumbents hate competition.
-
It's not totally clear to me who, overall, is making the money here...
-
Le petit et grand rentiers: DRM vendors for sure. Incumbents from content to browser powers too, by taxing competition and inter-locking in.
-
Sure, but why is any of this in the interest of CONTENT creators. It's a mystery to me. Rentiers persuade them of dumb piracy arguments?
-
Yes, and to suppress casual sharing. + to control supply of playback devices for price leverage. See https://twitter.com/BrendanEich/status/883730873014603776 … -- no mystery!
-
Casual sharing can be suppressed with streaming and very basic mitigations.
-
Basis for hope in watermarking. And yet, anything above SD was (s/w obfuscated) DRMed. Hollywood contracts require it, inertia + known qty.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.