... they power a lot of the things we do/have done, including personally and impact everyone. Improperly managed they introduce major risk..
-
-
... and I interpret the complexity argument in this context, that bad instruments lead to evil outcomes...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
... personally I disagree with the implications that Bitcoin at scale wouldn't enable an even greater risk in this area ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
... because almost anyone can invent almost any instrument and may or may not publicly record the whole framework, and regulation is harder.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I guess it comes from interpreting regulation as strictly unnecessary complexity?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Could be. I don't think it's just about regulation for more experienced advocates. Their theories include public deal records as a key tool
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
AIUI the idea is, if you can record all deals publicly, you can automate regulation. Not seen this actually work though.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Literally do not even understand the theory of this.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Regulation is stuff like mandating certain records of communications are held, audits of inventory / invoices.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
right, so you can imagine needing signed attestations for audits in public records and in order to close multi-homed deals
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
But this is extra-ledger regulation!
-
-
unless the plan is to deregulate theft, this is always true at some most primitive level
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.