To be fair, this doesn't look like JavaScript, but rather WebIDL (nit-picking)
-
-
-
Replying to @DasSurma
I think you're sitting close the web platform folks; they'd be a good audience for complaints in this case
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bmeurer
I guess so. But the web never forgets, you know? It's burnt into it for all eternity now...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DasSurma
This "web never forgets" is one of the main reasons for having includes() vs. contains() for example. <cough>web compat<cough>
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bmeurer
Surma Retweeted Surma
Yeah I am aware. Stupid compat. Who wants compat anyways?https://twitter.com/DasSurma/status/880066942652076032 …
Surma added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DasSurma
I've heard folks like
@bterlson,@miketaylr,@littledan,@Lady_Ada_King,@tomdale,@wycats, and others expressing interest in web compat
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Sheesh. Bringing out the big guns right away, huh?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
You know I was arguing to just break stuff in the past, but many people had good arguments why that shouldn't be done.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
The web is like a child, one mistake made in a fit of passion and you must legally support it for at least 18 years.
1 reply 0 retweets 21 likes
I can't wait for AMP to reach legal drinking age.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.