Been thinking about this. "Generalized" is usually the wrong thing anyway. Every inessential option is a failure to make a design decision.https://twitter.com/jlongster/status/879332102931722241 …
-
-
Replying to @BrandonBloom @jlongster
1: But the tech community is obsessed with new "paradigms" that "change computing forever". The enthusiasm for specialized solutions in this
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
2: thread is inconsistent with the way the tech community insists that "new paradigms" and "de facto standards" justify herd adoption of
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
3: popular libraries. Obviously there is some value in sharing, but "X is the new jQuery, it's already won!" argues that we should be
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
4/4: all driving towards one solution, which leads to the problem this thread is complaining about.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @BrandonBloom
I like to think about abstract ideas this way (one way data flow), but for implementations, let many flowers bloom!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jlongster @BrandonBloom
Even ideas are extremely subject to domain considerations. Frankly I think the react community is far too comfortable with One True Paradigm
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
For me, react shines as a way of boiling down constraints of UI design, especially on the web. Different constraints yield diff solutions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
React Native, sure maybe. React VR:
. It's certainly POSSIBLE that the constraints yield the same results, but we should check.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.