I don't love the hard sell. Reminds me of what Microsoft is doing with Edge in Windows 10. Do those at least go away forever if dismissed?
I could have believed that a few years ago. I find it very un-credible that the banners continue purely due to inertia.
-
-
How do you feel about http://google.com significantly incentivizing AMP pages served on http://google.com domains?
-
Misstep to put AMP cache on http://google.com . Mechanisms should have existed (do they now?) to make sharing the non-AMP URL default.
-
I could accept preferring fast sites, but preferring and actually speeding up sites served using Google tech via Google domains seems bad.
-
I don't attribute any of this to bad faith but I do think that good faith discussions too often result in problematic decisions at Google.
-
Fair enough. Great power, great responsibility, etc. I've seen things change when these missteps are pointed out. Hard balance to strike.
-
It seems that people assume: good faith + smart people = moral decisions But of course subtle incentives can change that.
-
I often hear "why are you assuming bad faith" or "Google is not one thing" as if it's a good defense against critiques of structural issues
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.