People are stating only one file ext is supported in their tool, .js as a Script
There's a 100% chance. @bradleymeck doesn't like it and will keep saying we've been over it.
-
-
Whats the counter proposal? CTC has already seen Defense of .js and Unambiguous Grammar
-
"CTC has already seen" doesn't mean CTC is right. It means CTC is being stubborn.
-
And guess what. CTC has the power to be stubborn. But not to shut up the people who don't like .mjs.
-
I mean we are talking right now. Disagreeme t does not mean I will shut you up in any way
-
I'm not questioning the legitimacy of the CTC to make the decision. But the choice implies nothing about technical quality.
-
I see many technical decisions, so... dont have a reply
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.