I also like generators over async functions in JS more and more. That README though...
It's internal jargon in the elevator pitch of a project meant to be used directly by end users.
-
-
And the fact that you think those jargons are equivalent is probably related to everyone's great surprise that monads aren't taking off.
-
Data binding and borrowing are terms carefully chosen to have some sort of intuitive meaning in English. One of these is not like the other.
-
This whole take is bad and not reflective of your usual level of thinking about things.
-
You think that "borrow" has the same kind of jargony nature as "monad" despite borrow being an English word meant to analogize borrowing?
-
I think "applicative" is no easier to understand than "monad" despite the friendly name and that helpful names matter less than you'd think.
-
"applicative" is not very similar to "borrow" in the friendly name dept. All of
@nikomatsakis' talks have stick figures borrowing things -
Also friendly names matter a lot. There's a reason for the name/cache invalidation joke.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.