That kind of jargon turns me off immediately.
-
-
Replying to @ryanflorence @jlongster
Strong confirm. You may love or hate Ember or Rust, but I enjoy working with people who treat accessibility as a first class goal.
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @wycats @jlongster
My own bias, but it conjures images of devs writing code to be "right", arguing over "correctness", instead of building useful programs
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ryanflorence @wycats
I get that, but that mentally discounts all sorts of good/interesting work along with all of that. And distances good people in academia
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jlongster @ryanflorence
I have no intention of distancing academia. Rust flourishes because of significant input from academic contexts. But ergonomic work matters.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The problem with industry is ignoring important work in academia. The problem with academia is ignoring the work industry does to make 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
promising results accessible. Great projects marry the two. 2/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Great practitioners pay attention to academic results, and great academics care about ergonomic results. 3/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
At the end of the day, it's only through a sustained circle between the two that we make real progress. 4/4
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @ryanflorence
I agree with that. The whole point of Reason is exactly that: to make the good stuff more approachable. "monad" not even in docs
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

