Can't help but feel promises/async/await too primitive. Too many assumptions baked in. How many things could be parallelized but aren't?
That jargon sucks. I'm embarrassed of that, especially "module unification layout". That said, it's an internal detail, so diff.
-
-
ppx is also internal OCaml jargon. Monad and applicative are no more jargony then data binding or borrowing.
-
It's internal jargon in the elevator pitch of a project meant to be used directly by end users.
-
And the fact that you think those jargons are equivalent is probably related to everyone's great surprise that monads aren't taking off.
-
Data binding and borrowing are terms carefully chosen to have some sort of intuitive meaning in English. One of these is not like the other.
-
This whole take is bad and not reflective of your usual level of thinking about things.
-
You think that "borrow" has the same kind of jargony nature as "monad" despite borrow being an English word meant to analogize borrowing?
-
I think "applicative" is no easier to understand than "monad" despite the friendly name and that helpful names matter less than you'd think.
-
"applicative" is not very similar to "borrow" in the friendly name dept. All of
@nikomatsakis' talks have stick figures borrowing things - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.