And then we offer them an opportunity to expense that amount of time if they want. We had been paying out contribs more than our core team.
-
-
Everyone with a GitHub has voting rights. Sponsors and Backers have golden influence 100x infulence.
-
And no we use a Algo to record contributors hours, we send an email offering them to expense their "pts" or convert it to voting influence
-
Does this discriminate (in influence) against people who *need* to take the money (low income etc)?
-
Provide an example if you could. Id like to provide a thoughtful example
-
Imagine a low-income person who wants to contribute to webpack and has to choose between $ and influence, while more well-off 1/
-
ppl wouldn't need the money and therefore get the influence. Seems potentially problematic. 2/2
-
That's a fair point I suppose, we just want to offer those who opt out (for whatever reason) to have a alternative way to impact.
-
In hindsight, our budget is not large enough to pay a fair wage at 40 hrs or work per month which is what the cap is atm
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.