Not arguing for (or against) Types btw. They are just another tool to be employed when appropriate. When is appropriate? 1/?
-
-
Replying to @brianleroux
Types are a way of building structures. Buildings are strong and withstand change. They do not prevent change but they do constrain it.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @brianleroux
Comparatively you could consider working loosely w data as creating an organism. An organism grows and evolves. It's nature *is* change.
5 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @brianleroux
Types (in the sense of TypeScript) enable radical change, they do not constrain it.
2 replies 9 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @wycats
As a 90s era (and present day) loser: all about being radical.
Can you share how w more resolution? (f2f fine-feels we could go on 4 days)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brianleroux @wycats
It is ok if you can't explain why Types w TS are a radical diff. I certainly can't. (Just means we don't understand it well enough.)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Oh I thought we were doing it f2f 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.