Not arguing for (or against) Types btw. They are just another tool to be employed when appropriate. When is appropriate? 1/?
-
-
As a 90s era (and present day) loser: all about being radical.
Can you share how w more resolution? (f2f fine-feels we could go on 4 days) -
It is ok if you can't explain why Types w TS are a radical diff. I certainly can't. (Just means we don't understand it well enough.)
-
Oh I thought we were doing it f2f
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
organizational change, maybe. and maybe that unlocks some kinds of software real pro's can't build. but i'm highly skeptical.
-
almost all good lastingly relevant broadly impacting software imo is v small. it sets other's free to start. it's /w that that I am critical
-
Does your criteria include Linux or Firefox/Chrome? Or was it carefully crafted to assume its own conclusion?
-
Browsers are nothing more than user agents for many small component pieces that work very well together.
-
The OS is nothing more than a bunch of very small resource APIs that unfortunately do interlock & turn into an awfully muddy ball sometimes.
-
This is an awfully romanticized view of the code that allows you to hold onto your beliefs.
-
This time I wouldn't disagree.
-
I also don't think I'm wrong to embrace what I embrace.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.