Means I don't see new concrete syntax that has with 1-1 mapping to old syntax as "language".
-
-
Maybe there's some plans or goals I'm not privy to.
Why am I always the last to be invited into the conspiracy?pic.twitter.com/jZu4JLLZpQ
-
This will forever be how I think about, and encourage use of JSX. Anything else including framework compilers is wildly unappealing to me.
-
I'm struggling to see yehuda's point myself. What mysticism?
-
I like JSX, truly (I implemented E4X back in the day & tamed crazy parts of its spec). Mysticism for me comes from immutability appearances+
-
which can deceive. Then
@sebmarkbage trolls me for not making JS be Haskell (premodern version) in 1995! So yes, JSX is just syntax: for JS! -
But the story of react is heavily focused on immutability, so the look is really deceiving.
-
I think we're agreeing :-P.
-
Can confirm.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.