I wasn't sure why none of the Redux example reducers show removing an item from an array, but I'm beginning to have an idea.pic.twitter.com/APJkP4pHvG
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I don’t think dividing functions into functions is very clever, but yes, it is required for using Redux successfully.
your argument was, more or less, that Tom should have remembered about .filter(). It's probably not that Tom 1/
wasn't *aware* of .filter(), but that he didn't think of it here. The fact that you remembered it isn't an answer. 2/2
my argument is that tom shouldn't have been a dingus
tbqh, the problem is that most of our design discussions in Ember end up with at least one "Y U NO REDUX".
I bet @tomdale was getting tired of it. Per @dan_abramov, the answer is that Redux is for people comfy with low-level.
This is fair. I don’t want to put Redux in ur Ember. 
wtf do we do this to each other? Jesus Christ.
I think @wycats is smarter and more considerate, in every sense, than these tweets suggest. Maybe time for reflection.
immutable objects in JS _are_ awkward, but they provide substantial value.
The egghead tutorial, and many other redux tutorials, cover this style in detail:https://egghead.io/lessons/javascript-redux-avoiding-array-mutations-with-concat-slice-and-spread …
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.