@BrendanEich @awbjs We'll release an update on the ES4 story. Here's a preview in case you want to comment: https://github.com/auth0/blog/pull/646/files …
-
-
The passive voice in early part is not good in my view; who did what? Netscape took JS to ECMA. Also, no Macromedia then.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Is someone winging it? Primary (testimonial) sources, none of which mention Macromedia in TC39 TG1 until 2005.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @awbjs
The Macromedia intro. does not correlate to TC-39 necessarily. It mainly establishes who they were and why they cared
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speyrott @BrendanEich
Note that by 1999 MSFT was also working on an “ES4” variant which was releases as http://jscript.net
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yeah. http://web.archive.org has Waldemar's JS2/ES4 spec;
@nzgb archived Andrew Clinick/MS's http://JScript.NET page.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
and JS2 more or less made it into http://JScript.net , which is still documented.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.