there's in particular trick he pulled that is basically the entire misdirection. He introduced a 1/
-
-
iow it seems annoying that something described as an "insight" isn't debatable.
-
because you aren't debating the insightful parts, you're ruining the joke parts
-
how do you know what I'm ruining! I didn't write the article!
-
what I critique is the idea that it's self evident that JS won't evolve to get 64 bit numbers in decades
-
or the idea that asm.js is anything but a temporary waystation on the path to WASM.
-
or the idea that asm.js/wasm have intrinsic double-digit overhead that won't be removed in decades
-
these are all real points that are very badly wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
what thought do I have to lead to be removed from this argument
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
