How I remember python's syntax: "what's the cutest way someone could have done this?"
-
-
-
Replying to @wycats
not the same, but obviously subjective -- x == y == z is cute; omitting some function because "it's just fmap . bind" is clever.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gankro
the subjective is how python gets to have hard and fast moral rules that they can disregard at a whim.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
there should be one way to do it: funcs and lambdas, oldstyle vs newstyle class, statements vs expressions
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
beautiful is better than ugly: def __init__(self), super(ThisClass, self).func(args)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and the fact that some things were fixed in py3 doesn't help. They were done in py2 despite the moral exhortations.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
at a minimum, it'd be great if python people had a bit more humility about Zen and didn't use it to finger wag other langs.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
