I'm amazed you're saying this. It doesn't take a conspiracy theory to have noticed Assange's tweets re Hillary had a diff tone
-
-
Replying to @wycats
You're conflating tone with content. I agree their feed was much more negative re Hillary.
2 replies 3 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @BenSpielberg
OK I think we agree now. I think the tone has an effect on what is reported.
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @wycats
Sure, but so do media biases, which are reflexively anti-Wikileaks & thus get a lot of facts wrong.
2 replies 4 retweets 57 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats
Sure. It's also not that hard to get facts right & to note that they've often been a force for good.
1 reply 3 retweets 24 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats @BenSpielberg
it's unfortunate that they have no interest in working with media orgs to avoid putting ppl in danger.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @wycats @BenSpielberg
You are spouting a Pentagon/Fox News talking point from 2010. Government admitted under oath no person harmed.
3 replies 9 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @WLTaskForce @wycats
I assumed he was referring to your non-curation policy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
also, more things have been released since 2010.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.