the level of vigor was just a liiiiiittle bit different.
-
-
Replying to @wycats
I mean, not very. And to the extent it is, a little more emphasis now that he's actually president seems warranted to me.
3 replies 2 retweets 38 likes -
Replying to @BenSpielberg
I'm amazed you're saying this. It doesn't take a conspiracy theory to have noticed Assange's tweets re Hillary had a diff tone
4 replies 3 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @wycats
You're conflating tone with content. I agree their feed was much more negative re Hillary.
2 replies 3 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @BenSpielberg
OK I think we agree now. I think the tone has an effect on what is reported.
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @wycats
Sure, but so do media biases, which are reflexively anti-Wikileaks & thus get a lot of facts wrong.
2 replies 4 retweets 57 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats
Sure. It's also not that hard to get facts right & to note that they've often been a force for good.
1 reply 3 retweets 24 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats
Their net contribution is a harder call than it used to be, but the reasons for that are complex & I still think it's net positive.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I think that's true as of now, yes.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.