I think the success of JSX isn't because devs suddenly forgot how to write code.
-
-
Replying to @chriseppstein
I'm genuinely confused. I think you're responding to an argument I didn't make.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
this thread inspired by the recent tweet by
@thomasfuchs.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
I think getting more things in one file is good, but turning everything into JS is less goo.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
less good!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Big issue with JSX is that streaming is (probably?) impossible.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
depends on your definition of streaming ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
From the server. You can send unclosed HTML in a tmpl lang like Handlebars, then send rest later. 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @matthewcp @wycats and
JSX doesn't have a concept of unclosed tags, so I'm not sure what you could do here. 2/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
right. JSX is inherently recursive (start and end sandwich the middle, value is returned all at once)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.