I replied on Hacker News with my feelings (as a TC39 member) about what's happening with promise cancellation: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13214487 …
sync cancellation is just throw no? generator.throw() on iterables.
-
-
no. It shouldn't throw at all. Silent unless extended to not be so.
-
I think building something sync+extensible is what is needed, more than building one async thing to rule them all.
-
so the spec becomes the "minimum API and behavior" that something conforming to the token interface must implement.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.