It also does matter because you can try to reduce the impediment to adoption as much as possible.
Languages are, at bottom, able to express the same computation, so that can't be it 2/
-
-
can you say more? 3/3
-
I mention some of my criterion here https://twitter.com/deech/status/809883383815929857 … and https://twitter.com/deech/status/809883863384260612 … but I maybe misunderstanding you.
-
according to your criteria, is it relevant at all if a programming language required all names to be UUIDs?
-
No, not a practical one that I am able to construct with my keyboard. I concede we're to some degree hamstrung by our input devices.
-
what if our keyboards had a "construct uuid" button?
-
What if we could see relationships instead of simple names. Have you checked out Prolog? Names aren't so useful there.
-
so instead of cat(X), d6bee5a3-1236-4174-9fbd-6844a446460c(c28f8392-9785-4ea3-b4f7-fe5b6892a5e7)?
-
If you can get a computer to build a graph for you and manipulate nodes, why not? Why must text be the lowest common denominator?
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.