is psychology pseudoscience? economics? or can we admit we can have science about human factors?
-
-
Replying to @wycats @littlecalculist
Of course we can. I just think that in this area we don't know much. Not claiming knowledge is impossible.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @samth @littlecalculist
we know a lot, but academic PL likes to believe we don't. Might explain something about adoption of PL ideas...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
honestly, I'm baffled by the fact that you believe that this is a mystery. Is there something tribal about it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
or are you pushing back against some ACTUAL pseudoscience in the academic sphere?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @littlecalculist
No, I actually think this. Most ppl disagree (academics and not), but point to different things they think impt.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @samth @littlecalculist
Are you recanting this?pic.twitter.com/kw0sJrYdn4
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @littlecalculist
I'd say I have very little evidence for that claim.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @samth @littlecalculist
seems bad to base your entire dissertation on it then ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @littlecalculist
Dissertation based on the fact of their adoption, for which we have excellent evidence. :-)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
dissertation is making the claim that the script-to-program strategy will help: an adoption claim.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.