O_O
-
-
Replying to @littlecalculist
More seriously, what matters depends on outcomes you want. If the metric is "programs work correctly", syntax matters less.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @samth @littlecalculist
If the metric is "people learn easily", syntax matters lots. If it's "people adopt my language" then who knows what matters
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @samth
Re adoption "syntax vs semantics" is myopic; have to understand tech in context
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @littlecalculist
I know we disagree here, but I genuinely think no one knows anything about PL adoption (except that everyone hates lisp :).
3 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @samth
like, do you think we have zero clues about how JS became popular?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @littlecalculist
I would say mandatory use increases popularity (by definition), but also that we don't know why Node took off when it did.
5 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @samth @littlecalculist
can you say why you think JS had mandatory adoption?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @littlecalculist
JS was the only language that worked in the script tag (leaving aside IE craziness).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @samth @littlecalculist
"it's easier to use JS" is not the same as "JS is mandatory" -- Java shipped in the 90s and Flash in the 2000s
2 replies 2 retweets 7 likes
if you think "it's easier to use JS" is === mandatory, and mandatory === adoption, we've made some progress here.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.