but anyway "mandatory usage" is a sufficient example. We know a lot about adoption!
-
-
Replying to @littlecalculist
I think "more people use something after they're forced to use it" is knowing very little.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @samth
so, how many things we know about adoption should we tweet till you agree they add up to more than "very little?" :P
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @littlecalculist
Other things we think of as good for adoption (like performance) correlate much less well with actual adoption.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @samth
the right conclusion is not "nothing about the tech affects human behavior"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @littlecalculist
I think that's the wrong conclusion, but "we don't know what aspects of the tech affect human behavior" is the right one.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @samth
I think we're back in disagreement unless it's just a matter of degree
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @samth
let's put it this way. "we know nothing" implies I've learned nothing valid in the last decade of my career; otoh I won't claim…
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @littlecalculist @samth
…to have produced peer-reviewed social science.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
"we know nothing about adoption" is the same thing as saying "economics is pseudoscience" 1/
-
-
it's hard to nail down, and there are a lot of disagreements, but we've learned things and the field of 2/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
inquiry is worth exploring. 3/3
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.