Yep. 2 huge problems with "Star Wars": no one is at "war" and no "stars" are relevantly involved. (These are not the 2 biggest problems.)https://twitter.com/pookleblinky/status/808478587212939265 …
-
-
-
Replying to @wycats
why did they call it "star wars"? Stars aren't involved, and they aren't at war. It's just a terribly misleading title.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Faster than light interstellar travel? It's a war that spans the stars, right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @knowtheory @wycats
but it's not a "war"! It's a coup d'etat where the immediately previous ruling dynasty regains power after a short break
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
There's definitely a resistance and civil war going on?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @knowtheory @wycats
Look, I'm also a star wars fan. But I'm critical of the things I fan at. SW is just shuffling aristocrats.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @izs @knowtheory
I see. I have found myself in a Escher painting analogy describing a broader political point. :P
5:42 PM - 12 Dec 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.