Some say HTML won't add new tags. Custom Elements will subsume the use case. Ofc there's no individual authority so who knows. Thoughts?
-
-
Replying to @sebmarkbage
This premise kind of changes how I think about React's DOM future proofing. It's a whole different story if you can assume stability.
3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @sebmarkbage
I have severe doubts. No more <video>? And isn't there a contingent of stds ppl who want to avoid JS where possible?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats
until we can implement IMG ourselves, new tags can be expected I think.
@sebmarkbage1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ryanflorence @sebmarkbage
I think it's reasonable to add things like <vr> - new tech happens.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
thought experiment: if <img> didn't already exist and we could impl in userspace, would we refuse to add it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @ryanflorence
Not sure. Might stall for years on debating whether we should and then a few more on the API.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sebmarkbage @ryanflorence
that's still different from "we'll never add another tag ever"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
refusing to add <img> is a dereliction of duty for the primary author on the web who just writes .html files
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.