that's why pluralism matters. A slack will leave me out.
-
-
Replying to @steveklabnik @littlecalculist
how can pluralism care about people who refuse to use Slack but not people who can't use IRC?
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @wycats @littlecalculist
slack barely works on my platform at all.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
-
Replying to @wycats @littlecalculist
Linux generally. At first, nothing. They have some packages now.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @steveklabnik @wycats
it strikes me as a little double-standard: “You can use webIRC” but “I won’t use web Slack”
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andrewdotnich @wycats
yes exactly. This isn't something
@wycats does, but many slack advocates totally minimize downsides while overblowing1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
well I was aiming that at you, mainly ;) /cc
@wycats2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @andrewdotnich @wycats
well even then, we're at most at a standstill. Slack isn't better.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik @andrewdotnich
I don't think we're at a standstill. You're saying Slack excludes you and other like you. Want to know more.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
if you're saying the web doesn't work on Linuxes other than Ubuntu... that seems bad (and may explain adoption)
-
-
Replying to @wycats
I’ll call out my own inconsistency here – would move to FreeBSD but fear losing OSX apps/clients /cc
@steveklabnik0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.