So much of the discourse around programming languages is totemistic. "X-lang is simple" "Y-lang is fast" "Z-lang scales."
I don't think "fast" is a useful context-free metric, but Rust is trying to say "we're trying to do all three"
-
-
which is genuinely useful regardless of whether you can measure Rust perf in absolute terms vs. say C
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.