I'm not sure what you mean; it seemed to me that we had strong consensus on hard private.
-
-
iirc
@awbjs suggested: "Stage 2 means consensus on hard" -@littlecalculist objected, I agreed1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @littledan and
Dan asked me if I minded recording this as consensus; I said this was fine since…
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @littlecalculist @wycats and
…we'd agreed that user experience would allow us to evaluate further
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @littlecalculist @littledan and
that sounds more or less in line with what I remember, except I wouldn't 1/
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @littlecalculist and
arguably undesirable for TC39ers to get ahead of notes publication timeline
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
people have always discussed outcomes as they happen, for years. seems fine to me!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @littlecalculist @awbjs and
also remember strong objection to the idea of NDA
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @wycats @littlecalculist and
we lag notes publication to give all attendee a chance to review&correct
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
jumping the gun in public is bad manners
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
probably also good to be careful about suggesting members violating norms.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.