ppl in favor of short soft less willing to block. Result: hard private wins. cmte pathology? Yes, according to Good/Bad/Ugly.
-
-
Replying to @wycats @BrendanEich
bad thing committee ignores people's opinion https://github.com/tc39/proposal-private-fields/issues/14 …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I discussed that thread.
@awbjs said there was a big effort to make that work, but impossible.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @littledan @chicoxyzzy and
we don't have consensus right now (more ppl want soft than I thought, like it or not)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @chicoxyzzy and
I'm not sure what you mean; it seemed to me that we had strong consensus on hard private.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
iirc
@awbjs suggested: "Stage 2 means consensus on hard" -@littlecalculist objected, I agreed1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @littledan and
Dan asked me if I minded recording this as consensus; I said this was fine since…
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @littlecalculist @wycats and
…we'd agreed that user experience would allow us to evaluate further
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @littlecalculist @littledan and
that sounds more or less in line with what I remember, except I wouldn't 1/
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @littlecalculist and
Notes will be published. Until then individual recollections are just that.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
notes do not become better than recollections simply because they're published
-
-
tell that to Fermat
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.