I suspect @littledan's point about "TC39 believes" is also true about "we don't believe" ;)
-
-
Replying to @wycats
No, different "We" there - at least
@bmeurer &@littledan don't believe. My TC39 wants was based on multiple F2F meetings & discuss.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I doubt v8 has a unified position about "u64 worth the effort" esp. ppl who want to please Node.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
Who said "V8"? I'm just yakking with
@bmeurer &@littledan :-P.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yehuda Katz 🥨 Retweeted Benedikt Meurer
may have misread https://twitter.com/bmeurer/status/804520267577966593 … (seems to refer to v8?)
Yehuda Katz 🥨 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If that's V8's position it was not represented yesterday at TC39 meeting. I think we're just tweeting fools :-/
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BrendanEich @wycats
I'm sorry for the confusion. I cannot speak for the V8 wrt.
@TC39, only@littledan can do that. 1/1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
So by "We" I meant a couple of people on the V8 team, not necessarily representative for the whole team though. 2/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
We weren't aware that Int64/Uint64 would be a hot topic, otherwise we'd have prepared an official position for. 3/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Now that we are aware, we'll discuss the topic (incl. considering Node.js concerns/requests) for next
@TC39. 4/42 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
awesome. One of the best reasons for i64 is being able to work with binary data in JS. (protobuf lib, e.g.)
-
-
@littledan Who knew JS was a low-level (and high-level) language? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZqhRICne_M …1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
I once wrote a protobuf lib in ruby and got crushed by the 2/64 times an input got promoted to bignum
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.