In this case I meant what I wrote. We've been over this for years, back to IBM's 2008-era push for Decimal.
-
-
If that's V8's position it was not represented yesterday at TC39 meeting. I think we're just tweeting fools :-/
-
I'm sorry for the confusion. I cannot speak for the V8 wrt.
@TC39, only@littledan can do that. 1/ -
So by "We" I meant a couple of people on the V8 team, not necessarily representative for the whole team though. 2/
-
We weren't aware that Int64/Uint64 would be a hot topic, otherwise we'd have prepared an official position for. 3/
-
Now that we are aware, we'll discuss the topic (incl. considering Node.js concerns/requests) for next
@TC39. 4/4 -
awesome. One of the best reasons for i64 is being able to work with binary data in JS. (protobuf lib, e.g.)
-
@littledan Who knew JS was a low-level (and high-level) language? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZqhRICne_M … -
I once wrote a protobuf lib in ruby and got crushed by the 2/64 times an input got promoted to bignum
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.