this post made me want to know what TC39 is
-
-
Replying to @b0rk
oh, you know, just the committee that makes JavaScript. No big thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @wycats
yeah the workings of these standards committees are completely mysterious to me. I'd love to hear more about how the process feels
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @b0rk
throw some questions at me and I'll try and answer them tomorrow on the blog. If not I'll try to answer the generic Q.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @wycats
who is in the meeting? do you have to implement the future of JavaScript before you decide on it?
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @b0rk
Short answers: Who's there? Engine implementors, developers, a handful of academics and theorists, and
@BrendanEich.1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
"do you have to implement the future of JavaScript before you decide on it?" no -> polyfills/transpilers -> engines -> locked
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
"do people mostly agree fundamentally on what the future of JavaScript should look like?" No, but there's agreement on big picture
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
There is??
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
I would be VERY interested in hearing what this thing we agree on is.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yehuda Katz 🥨 Retweeted Yehuda Katz 🥨
Yehuda Katz 🥨 added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.