so I get what you're saying but "the media" covered the potential for bribery relatively little vs emails.
and people who criticize the NYT disagree with your disagreement with the characterization ;)
-
-
not saying they're right, just that we should understand the critique.
-
Oh sure, i understand the critique (you're moving the goalposts btw), but it feels ahistorical :P
-
what were the original goalposts I was talking about?
-
From "Media didn't cover Trump's unsuitability adequately" to "Media got played by Trump & friends"
-
i'll concede that's probably the best steel-manning of the argument, but it's also not much of the actual discussion :D
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
