sure, but "this study shows pair programming doesn't improve productivity over the control" is pointless.
-
-
Replying to @wycats
don't think I argued for that. Just said that certain team sorta-"metrics" provide clues for what to improve
@saronyitbarek1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's easy to bike-shed and misjudge when you rely solely on intuition. Some data isn't a bad thing.
@saronyitbarek1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I've seen subjective evaluation of people lead to a lot of resentment. And it's justified.
@saronyitbarek1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And assuming we want to be more objective, I'd rather measure the team than individuals. It's all about incentives.
@saronyitbarek2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I want to reward people for doing things that make the team more effective, even at a loss to their own productivity.
@saronyitbarek2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amcaplan @saronyitbarek
measuring effectiveness contributions individually doesn't work ime.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I like to reward team achievements and personal growth.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
Very reasonable. I also want to set up systems to warn me if people are being left behind.
@saronyitbarek2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
And I want to recognize individuals' actions to boost each other as of equal or greater value than their own work.
@saronyitbarek1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
strong confirm. Rewarding team work is a good way to boost individual contribution to team success.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.