yep.
stream of consciousness: I think your OO/FP division is too charitable to FP.
-
-
yeah, like every other developer I have my preferences ;)
-
I think FP folks are often too self-congratulatory about succeeding at minimizing mutability/moving parts
-
having a "single global atom" that you "replace every time something changes" is pretty similar to globals
-
yeah I address that in the final section :) thanks for looking through it
-
yeah... I really liked that you got into it. fwiw I'm fine with FP -- Rust is pretty into FP after all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Done. I think this is a nice starting point for a discussion on this topic. Good work :D
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd say "Functional Programming makes code feel understandable by appearing to minimize moving parts." ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
