I think @ryanflorence nailed it in an early tweet asking whether or not HTML and CSS are good abstractions.
-
-
Replying to @traviskaufman @rauchg and
HTML and CSS are excellent abstractions. For documents. Not necessarily for complex web apps.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
agreed. Think of a component as a small document. Writing in JS = free lazy load, module system, lint…
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
in my opinion is this is a very late-2016 POV. I think it'll look very dated in a year.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I hope so! I want to server-render isolated CSS but I can't (https://github.com/zeit/next.js/issues/22 …), so I need it :)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
tl;DR: in 2016 we still can't render "subdocuments" to which only a subset of CSS applies. Will change
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I'm honestly interested most in functionality. We want to enable devs to create great UX *easily*.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm interested in teams being able to style things without breaking each other's stuff.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @rauchg @traviskaufman and
you can make it easy, but "easy and breaks tomorrow" doesn't quite fit the bill
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
we can make this work without moving the entire ecosystem to JS.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
a good question to ask: is the change narrowly tailored to the problem? This one is laughably tailored
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.