it's not censoring to ask people to disagree politely.
-
-
-
Replying to @wycats @aleattorium
harassment is SUPPRESSION of free speech, so it needs to be suppressed.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
or the viewpoint of people that harass will dominate
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
allowing harassment is NOT in the interest of freedom of speech
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mpjme @aleattorium
it's easy to let this slip into censorship, especially of people who feel unheard, but strong agree.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
a that's exactly where my concern resides. It's been seen before that the natural path is to end with censorship
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aleattorium @wycats
if the alternative is a community driven by the minority view of harassers, that is way preferable.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mpjme @aleattorium
jumping directly to zero-sum "bad or worse" decisions leads to unsustainable communities imo.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @aleattorium
Well, it was mostly reductio ad absurdum response. Protecting good debate climate is critical for FOS imho.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
yeah Twitter likes a fight.
-
-
Replying to @wycats @aleattorium
speaking of twitter, the Leslie Jones thing is a great example of what happens is low-moderation env.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
bullies must be dealt with swiftly.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.