this. That's the most important part. But how you do that without censoring, which also makes good ppl leave.
-
-
Replying to @aleattorium @wycats
it's not censoring to ask people to disagree politely.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats @aleattorium
harassment is SUPPRESSION of free speech, so it needs to be suppressed.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
or the viewpoint of people that harass will dominate
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
allowing harassment is NOT in the interest of freedom of speech
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mpjme @aleattorium
it's easy to let this slip into censorship, especially of people who feel unheard, but strong agree.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
a that's exactly where my concern resides. It's been seen before that the natural path is to end with censorship
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aleattorium @wycats
if the alternative is a community driven by the minority view of harassers, that is way preferable.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
but I really don't think that "behave like a normal polite human being" is a step to 1984.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/11/03/all-in-all-another-brick-in-the-motte/ … ;) but I get you. Striving for positive sum here is really hard.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.