In a new framework called e.g Foobar (2 letter abbreviation: fo) that uses many HTML attributes, what do you prefer for the attribute names?
I've seen this kind of thing throughout my life in various places. It's very clever.
-
-
The funny thing is, this stuff is promoted as more community participation. LOL?
-
that's why it's so clever!
-
yup. They even managed to convince authors to defend this, lol. Meanwhile, the WG hands are tied except for the tiniest spec details
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
wouldn’t it be best to ignore those requested and have frameworks use data-x- or data-ng- . data-x- seems best
-
I'm confused. So you want even more verbosity than what we have now with the same lack of namespacing?
-
what I mean is that perhaps it would be best to put all custom tags in one box rather than mixing official tags /1
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.