In a new framework called e.g Foobar (2 letter abbreviation: fo) that uses many HTML attributes, what do you prefer for the attribute names?
-
-
There is a proposal on
@wicg_ that it gone largely ignored by the people in charge of HTML specs:https://discourse.wicg.io/t/relaxing-restrictions-on-custom-attribute-names/1444 … -
how can we move it? And why are community groups the place proposals go to die?
-
Dunno, Google has been promoting
@wicg_ hugely, basically forcing every W3C WG to use it for everything, so it's odd. -
probably gives proposals from existing members more of a populist look w/o moving outsider proposals much faster :/
-
Basically, there's less of a process, so browser vendors can pick whatever they like with no reasoning.
-
I've seen this kind of thing throughout my life in various places. It's very clever.
-
The funny thing is, this stuff is promoted as more community participation. LOL?
-
that's why it's so clever!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.