everyone's got some skeletons. If they admit it or not
-
-
Replying to @stefanpenner @wycats and
I truly think an unsaid battle against WebPack+React atm is whether DI has purpose
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Runspired @stefanpenner and
and the answer is unambiguously yes.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @wycats @Runspired and
you either accept that or you build an ad-hoc, informally specified ... DI
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @Runspired and
There's so many times I've found myself questioning DI vs Modules.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think we overuse DI in Ember-land atm, there is a balance, will find it.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats @Runspired and
DI is useful whenever there's "top level state" in modules
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @wycats
@RyanTablada@Runspired@landongn@stefanpenner@richardiii@fivetanley "Top level state" sounds like a fancy word for global. :P1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nicholasruunu @wycats and
not really, but sometimes is state that used to be there
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
it means top-level let variables in a module.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.