fair enough.
-
-
I was mostly responding to "30% is awesome!" in your rebuttal to Zed, which feels pretty wrong to me.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Also, everybody who paid attention knew the 2->3 thing was planned to take years.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ubernostrum @eevee
this is pretty misleading. Here's a post from 2011 making the same point. http://sayspy.blogspot.com/2011/01/my-semi-regular-reminder-that-python-3.html …pic.twitter.com/vLyfqf2Qne
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
2009 + 5 = 2014. We're now at the end of 2016.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And the major libraries/frameworks basically got there by 2014 or earlier.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ubernostrum @eevee
Rails supported Ruby 1.9 in 2011 but we didn't consider that "adoption", just the beginning.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
OK. If you redefine adoption you get to be right. But I don't agree w/your redefinition.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Py3 got adopted fast by single-codebase method not by "we are only Py3 now" method.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Maybe big difference w/Python vs other languages: extreme effort to make sure that was viable method.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.